Evaluation of chemical and microbiological quality of selected retail meats in Jaffna, Sri Lanka for health safety assessment

Gowri Rajkumar, Chalana S. Sabaragamuwa, Arulanantham C. Thavaranjit

Abstract


Meat is an important source of high-quality protein, supplying all essential amino acids required for human nutrition. This study evaluated the physico-chemical characteristics and microbiological quality of fresh retail meat chicken, beef, and mutton to assess their safety for human consumption. A total of fifteen samples (n = 5 per meat type) were collected from retail outlets in Jaffna town, Sri Lanka, to generate baseline data relevant to public health monitoring and meat safety improvement. Physico-chemical analysis revealed variations among meat types. Chicken showed the highest pH (6.74 ± 0.12), while beef exhibited the lowest (5.87 ± 0.02). Moisture content ranged from 70.03 ± 1.51% in beef to 73.52 ± 1.22% in chicken. Mutton had the highest ash content (3.03 ± 0.10%), whereas beef recorded the highest fat (3.53 ± 0.12%) and protein content (23.16 ± 0.58%). Carbohydrate content was lowest in mutton (0.55 ± 0.05%). Water activity values ranged from 0.714 to 0.740, and beef showed the highest caloric value (578 ± 2 kcal/100 g). Microbiological analysis indicated considerable microbial loads across samples. Mesophilic counts were highest in chicken (7.39 log CFU/g). Psychrophilic bacteria were absent in chicken but detected in beef and mutton. Total and fecal coliform counts were highest in chicken and mutton, respectively. Mutton exhibited the highest Enterobacter counts, while E. coli levels were highest in chicken. Staphylococcus aureus was most prevalent in beef. Salmonella spp. and Shigella spp. were not detected in any sample. Overall, the findings emphasize the need for continuous monitoring and improved hygienic practices in retail meat handling to ensure consumer safety and protect public health.

Keywords: Chicken, beef, hygiene, microbiological parameters, mutton, safety monitoring.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aberle ED, Forrest JC, Gerrard DE, Mills EW. 2012. Principles of meat science (5th ed.). Kendall Hunt Publishing.

Ahmad RS, Imran A, Hussain MB. 2018. Nutritional composition of meat. In Y. H. Hui (Ed.), Meat science and nutrition (pp. 61–77). IntechOpen.

https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.77045

Alahakoon AU, Jo C, Jayasena DD. 2016. An overview of meat industry in Sri Lanka: A comprehensive review. Food Science of Animal Resources 36(2):137–144.

https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2016.36.2.137

AOAC, Official methods of analysis, 20th edition. Association of Analytical Chemists. Washington D.C. 2016.

Bhandare SG, Sherikar AT, Paturkar AM, Waskar VS, Zende RJ. 2007. A comparison of microbial contamination on sheep/goat carcasses in a modern Indian abattoir and traditional meat shops. Food Control 18(7): 854–858.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.04.012

Bintsis, T. (2017). Foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiology 3(3): 529–563.

https://doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.529

Cappellozza BI, Marques RS. 2021. Effects of pre-slaughter stress on meat characteristics and consumer experience. In Bruno I. Cappellozza & Rodrigo S. Marques (Eds.), Meat quality. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96742

Church DD, Hirsch KR, Park S, Kim I-Y, Gwin JA, Pasiakos SM, Wolfe RR, Ferrando AA. 2020. Essential amino acids and protein synthesis: Insights into maximizing the muscle and whole-body response to feeding. Nutrients 12(12): 3717.

https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123717

Department of Census and Statistics . 2014. Livestock and poultry statistics. Ministry of Finance and Planning, Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Dransfield E. 2008. The taste of fat. Meat Science 80(1): 37–42.

Erdem B, Ercis S, Hasceli, G, Gur D, Aysev AD. 2005. Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica group C strains isolated from humans in Turkey, 2000–2002. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 26(1): 33–37.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.03.007

FAO 2011. FAO food composition table for use in Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization.

Fontana AJ Jr. 2001. Water activity’s role in food safety and quality. Food Safety Magazine. Accessed at https://www.food-safety.com/articles/4420-water-activitye28099s-role-in-food-safety-and-quality.

Geletu US, Usmael MA, Mummed YY, Ibrahim AM. 2021. Quality of cattle meat and its compositional constituents. Veterinary Medicine International 2021:1–9.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7340495

González N, Marquès M, Nadal M, Domingo JL. 2020. Meat consumption: Which are the current global risks? A review of recent (2010–2020) evidences. Food Research International 137, 109341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109341

Greenberg A E, Hunt CW. 1985. Fecal coliforms as indicators of water quality. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation 57(7):715–719.

Hadero T, Nigusse G. Banerjee S. 2021. Assessment of beef meat handling, physicochemical and bacteriological properties of selected butcheries in Hawassa City, Ethiopia. SINET: Ethiopian Journal of Science 44(1): 62–73. https://doi.org/10.4314/sinet.v44i1.6

Erkmen O. 2022. Practice 13 – Isolation and counting of coliforms and Escherichia coli. In: Microbiological analysis of foods and food processing environments (pp. 105–140). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91651-6.00051-3

ICMSF 2011. Microorganisms in foods 7: Microbiological testing in food safety management. Springer.

Kadariya J, Smith TC, Thapaliya, D. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal food-borne disease: An ongoing challenge in public health. BioMed Research International 2014: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/827965

Klurfeld DM. 2018. What is the role of meat in a healthy diet? Animal Frontiers 8(3):5-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfy009

Koutsoumanis K, Stamatiou A, Skandamis P, Nychas GJ E. 2006. Development of a microbial model for the combined effect of temperature and pH on spoilage of ground meat, and validation of the model under dynamic temperature conditions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(1), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.72.1.124-134.2006

Kralik G, Gallo V, Svoboda J. 2018. Poultry meat quality. Animal Husbandry and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72865

Kulasooriya GDBN, Amarasiri MKUT, Abeykoon AMH, Kalupahana RS. 2019. Salmonella, Campylobacter and Escherichia coli in raw chicken meat, chicken products and cooked chicken in retail markets in Kandy, Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Veterinary Journal 66(1):19. https://doi.org/10.4038/slvj.v66i1.33

Lawrie RA, Ledward DA. 2006. Lawrie’s meat science (7th ed.). Woodhead Publishing.

Leonard WR, Snodgrass JJ, Robertson ML. 2007. Effects of brain evolution on human nutrition and metabolism. Annual Review of Nutrition 27: 311–327.

https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.nutr.27.061406.093659

Mir NA, Dar MA, Bhat ZF, Kumar S. 2017. Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: A review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 54(10): 2997–3009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2789-z

Missiakas DM, Schneewind O. 2013. Growth and laboratory maintenance of Staphylococcus aureus. Current Protocols in Microbiology 28(1):9C.1.1-9C.1.9

https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471729259.mc09c01s28

Ncoko P, Jaja IF, Oguttu, JW. 2020. Microbiological quality of beef, mutton, and water from different abattoirs in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Veterinary World 13(7):1363–1371. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2020.1363-1371

Nashath NF, Thavaranjit AC, Rajkumar G, Srikaran R. 2022. Microbial and chemical quality of selected dried fish available in a retail market as an approach for assessing health safety. Journal of Food and Agriculture 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4038/jfa.v15i1.5259

Paille D, Hackney C, Reily L, Cole M, Kilgen M. 1987. Seasonal variation in the fecal coliform population of Louisiana oysters and its relationship to microbiological quality. Journal of Food Protection 50(7): 545–549. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028x-50.7.545

Panisello PJ, Rooney R, Quantick PC, Stanwell-Smith R. 2000. Application of foodborne disease outbreak data in the development and maintenance of HACCP systems. International Journal of Food Microbiology 59(3): 221–234.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1605(00)00376-7

Prabakaran R. 2003. Good practices in planning and management of integrated commercial poultry production in South Asia. Food and Agriculture Organization.

Racchi I, Scaramuzza N, Hidalgo A, Berni E. 2020. Combined effect of water activity and pH on the growth of food-related ascospore-forming molds. Annals of Microbiology 70: 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13213-020-01612-6

Rajkumar G, Silva R, Weerasena J, Fernando K. 2014. Comparison of general nutritional composition of wild rice Oryza rhizomatis D.A. Vaughan and the commercial variety Bg352. Tropical Plant Research 1(2): 8–10.

Schumacher M, DelCurto Wyffels H, Thomson J, Boles J. 2022. Fat deposition and fat effects on meat quality: A review. Animals 12(12):1550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121550

Sofos JN. 2008. Challenges to meat safety in the 21st century. Meat Science 78(1–2): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.027

Sristi PR, Das NR, Akhter A, Kaniya NM, Hashem MA. 2025. Relation among meat pH, color and tenderness: A review. Meat Research 5(3):117: 1–7.

https://doi.org/10.55002/mr.5.3.117

Valenzuela PL, Mata F, Morales JS, Castillo-García A, Lucia A. 2019. Does beef protein supplementation improve body composition and exercise performance? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients 11(6): 1429. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11061429

Warner RD. 2023. The eating quality of meat: IV-Water holding capacity and juiciness. In: Lawrie’s Meat Science, 9th Edition, Chapter IV, 457–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-85408-5.00008-x

Wolfe RR. 2024. Consideration of the role of protein quality in determining the dietary requirement for protein and amino acids. Frontiers in Nutrition 11:1389664. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1389664

Yammine J, Karam L. 2020. Microbiological quality and safety of retail chicken and beef products in Lebanon. Journal of Food Quality and Hazards Control 7(2): 2885. https://doi.org/10.18502/jfqhc.7.2.2885


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons Licence
Ruhuna Journal of Science by University of Ruhuna is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

eISSN: 2536-8400

Print ISSN: 1800-279X (Before 2014)